Top Software Outsourcing Companies UK

Ciklum vs 10Clouds: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Ciklum (4.3/5) edges ahead of 10Clouds (3.6/5) overall. Ciklum is the better choice for UK enterprises wanting an actual UK legal entity to contract with. 10Clouds is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting design-forward, mobile-first product development. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Ciklum vs 10Clouds: head-to-head summary

Criterion Ciklum 10Clouds
Founded 2002 2009
HQ London, United Kingdom (Kyiv-founded; large Ukraine delivery centers) Warsaw, Poland
Team size ~3,900 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)
Rating 4.3 / 5 3.6 / 5
Primary differentiator One of the few companies on this list genuinely headquartered in London rather than merely selling into the UK market A design-led, mobile-first product culture built over more than fifteen years
Pricing model Dedicated-team and consulting engagements Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Java, React, Data engineering React Native, React, Node.js
Industries served Retail, Financial services, Media Fintech, SaaS, Consumer apps

Ciklum vs 10Clouds: overview

Ciklum

Ciklum's legal headquarters moved from Kyiv to London some years after its 2002 founding, which is unusual on a UK-facing list: most outsourcing companies serving British clients are headquartered elsewhere and simply sell into the UK market. Its roughly 3,900-person team still delivers primarily from Ukraine, spanning full-lifecycle product engineering across cloud, data, and digital work for enterprise clients. That London incorporation gives UK buyers a domestic contracting entity, something several peers on this list, however strong their engineering, simply cannot offer.

10Clouds

10Clouds was founded in Warsaw, Poland in 2009 and has built a reputation for strong design culture layered onto mobile-first product development, serving international clients including UK businesses. Its EU headquarters gives it the same straightforward GDPR posture as its Polish peers on this list, useful for a UK buyer's data-processing agreements. Public information on its current team size is thinner than for some peers, so buyers should confirm current capacity directly.

Services and capabilities: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Capability Ciklum 10Clouds
Custom build
Consulting
Integration
Staff augmentation
Fixed-price projects
Dedicated team model

Tech stack comparison: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Framework / platform Ciklum 10Clouds
React
AWS N/A N/A
Node.js N/A
Java N/A
.NET N/A

Pricing comparison: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Criterion Ciklum 10Clouds
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project Dedicated team, Fixed project
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Dimension Ciklum 10Clouds
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Retail, Financial services, Media Fintech, SaaS, Consumer apps
Best use cases A UK enterprise that specifically requires a domestic contracting entity for procurement reasons., A large program wanting UK legal accountability with offshore delivery scale. A UK company wanting a design-led mobile product built by an EU-based team., A startup that values design culture as much as raw engineering throughput.
Typical project type Dedicated team Dedicated team

Ciklum vs 10Clouds: pros and cons

Ciklum
+ An actual London legal headquarters, a step beyond most peers' UK sales presence.
+ Large delivery capacity built over two decades of real multi-team program experience.
+ Full-lifecycle product engineering practice, beyond narrow staffing focus.
- Delivery workforce is concentrated in Ukraine, so day-to-day contact is rarely UK-based
- Process overhead closer to an enterprise integrator than a founder-led boutique
10Clouds
+ Strong design culture combined with mobile-first product development.
+ EU headquarters simplifies GDPR-aligned data handling for UK clients.
+ Over fifteen years of continuous operation since 2009.
- Public documentation of current team size is thinner than for more established peers (per company website; independently unverifiable)
- No dedicated UK office; contact runs through the Warsaw base

Who should choose Ciklum?

A typical fit: a UK enterprise that specifically requires a domestic contracting entity for procurement reasons.

One of the few companies on this list genuinely headquartered in London rather than merely selling into the UK market. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media.

Who should choose 10Clouds?

A typical fit: a UK company wanting a design-led mobile product built by an EU-based team.

A design-led, mobile-first product culture built over more than fifteen years. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, SaaS, Consumer apps.

Decision matrix: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Ciklum
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Ciklum
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Ciklum (Not published) vs 10Clouds (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Ciklum
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Use case Ciklum fit 10Clouds fit Winner
A UK enterprise that specifically requires a domestic contracting entity for procurement reasons. Strong Strong Both equally
A large program wanting UK legal accountability with offshore delivery scale. Strong Strong Both equally
A UK company wanting a design-led mobile product built by an EU-based team. Strong Strong Both equally
A startup that values design culture as much as raw engineering throughput. Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Ciklum vs 10Clouds

Ciklum (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. One of the few companies on this list genuinely headquartered in London rather than merely selling into the UK market.

10Clouds (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need a startup that values design culture as much as raw engineering throughput. If your situation matches that, 10Clouds is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Ciklum vs 10Clouds FAQ

Is Ciklum better than 10Clouds?

Ciklum (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Ciklum's strongest advantage: an actual London legal headquarters, a step beyond most peers' UK sales presence. 10Clouds's strongest advantage: strong design culture combined with mobile-first product development.

How do Ciklum and 10Clouds differ in pricing?

Ciklum uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. 10Clouds uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Ciklum or 10Clouds?

10Clouds is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Ciklum and 10Clouds?

Ciklum's primary differentiator is: one of the few companies on this list genuinely headquartered in London rather than merely selling into the UK market. 10Clouds's primary differentiator is: a design-led, mobile-first product culture built over more than fifteen years. They also differ in team size (~3,900 vs 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Financial services vs Fintech, SaaS).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.