Endava vs Euristiq: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Euristiq (3.7/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Euristiq is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting EU-based delivery from a newer, more flexible vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Euristiq: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2016 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Lviv, Ukraine / Toronto, Canada / Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | A Warsaw commercial office keeping it inside the EU's GDPR framework, alongside its Lviv engineering base |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, Node.js, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Retail, Fintech |
Endava vs Euristiq: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Euristiq
Euristiq's Warsaw office keeps the company inside the EU's GDPR framework directly, useful for a UK buyer's data-processing terms, one part of a commercial footprint that also reaches Toronto alongside its Lviv engineering base since launching in 2016. The company is one of the newer firms on this list, with a shorter multi-year track record than the decades-old companies elsewhere in this review. Its public work spans general product development rather than one named vertical.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Euristiq
| Capability | Endava | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Euristiq
| Framework / platform | Endava | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Euristiq
| Criterion | Endava | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Euristiq
| Dimension | Endava | Euristiq |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Retail, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK buyer wanting EU-based delivery with GDPR alignment built in., A startup wanting a newer, more nimble vendor over an established enterprise firm. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Euristiq: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Euristiq | |
|---|---|
| + | Warsaw office keeps it inside the EU's GDPR framework for UK data-processing terms. |
| + | Commercial presence in both Canada and the EU, useful for buyers in either market. |
| + | Built a multi-country footprint relatively quickly since its 2016 launch. |
| - | Shorter operating history than most peers on this list, with less multi-year track record |
| - | No dedicated UK office among the companies on this list |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Euristiq?
A typical fit: a UK buyer wanting EU-based delivery with GDPR alignment built in.
A Warsaw commercial office keeping it inside the EU's GDPR framework, alongside its Lviv engineering base. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Euristiq
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Euristiq (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Euristiq
| Use case | Endava fit | Euristiq fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK buyer wanting EU-based delivery with GDPR alignment built in. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A startup wanting a newer, more nimble vendor over an established enterprise firm. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Euristiq
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Euristiq (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need a startup wanting a newer, more nimble vendor over an established enterprise firm. If your situation matches that, Euristiq is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Euristiq FAQ
Is Endava better than Euristiq?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Euristiq's strongest advantage: warsaw office keeps it inside the EU's GDPR framework for UK data-processing terms.
How do Endava and Euristiq differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Euristiq uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Euristiq?
Euristiq is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Euristiq?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Euristiq's primary differentiator is: a Warsaw commercial office keeping it inside the EU's GDPR framework, alongside its Lviv engineering base. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Retail, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.