Endava vs Intellias: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Intellias (4.0/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Intellias is the stronger option for UK automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers building connected-vehicle software. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Intellias: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 3,500+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | Deep automotive and connected-vehicle software specialization that substitutes for a UK office address |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-scope engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | C++, Embedded platforms, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Automotive, Navigation & location services, Enterprise IT |
Endava vs Intellias: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Intellias
No UK entity, unlike Ciklum or Endava on this list; Intellias has instead put more than two decades since its 2002 founding into building a specific reputation in automotive and connected-vehicle software, growing to roughly 3,500 engineers while staying headquartered where it started, in Lviv. Automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers get specialist attention a generalist UK-facing vendor structurally can't match. Buyers outside automotive get comparable general engineering capacity from several similarly sized peers on this list.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Intellias
| Capability | Endava | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Intellias
| Framework / platform | Endava | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Intellias
| Criterion | Endava | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Intellias
| Dimension | Endava | Intellias |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Automotive, Navigation & location services, Enterprise IT |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK automotive OEM or Tier 1 supplier building connected-vehicle or navigation software., An enterprise wanting specialist depth over general full-stack breadth. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Intellias: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Intellias | |
|---|---|
| + | Verifiable automotive and navigation-technology depth, backed by real client work rather than a marketing label. |
| + | Team size in the thousands supports real multi-team programs. |
| + | Remains headquartered in Lviv, giving a stable, singular delivery base. |
| - | No dedicated UK office, unlike Ciklum or Endava on this list |
| - | Automotive specialization adds less value for buyers outside that vertical |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Intellias?
A typical fit: a UK automotive OEM or Tier 1 supplier building connected-vehicle or navigation software.
Deep automotive and connected-vehicle software specialization that substitutes for a UK office address. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Navigation & location services, Enterprise IT.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Intellias
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Intellias (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Intellias
| Use case | Endava fit | Intellias fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK automotive OEM or Tier 1 supplier building connected-vehicle or navigation software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise wanting specialist depth over general full-stack breadth. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Intellias
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Intellias (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need an enterprise wanting specialist depth over general full-stack breadth. If your situation matches that, Intellias is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Intellias FAQ
Is Endava better than Intellias?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Intellias's strongest advantage: verifiable automotive and navigation-technology depth, backed by real client work rather than a marketing label.
How do Endava and Intellias differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Intellias uses dedicated-team and fixed-scope engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Intellias?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Intellias?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Intellias's primary differentiator is: deep automotive and connected-vehicle software specialization that substitutes for a UK office address. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 3,500+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Automotive, Navigation & location services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.