Endava vs Moravio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Moravio (3.6/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Moravio is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting a Czech Republic-based EU vendor for variety. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Moravio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Moravio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2011 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Ostrava, Czech Republic (additional team in Slovakia) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | ~75 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | The only Czech Republic-headquartered company on this list, a distinct EU jurisdiction from the Polish and Ukrainian majority |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, Node.js, AI/ML platforms |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech |
Endava vs Moravio: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Moravio
Moravio was founded in Ostrava, Czech Republic in 2011 and has grown into an international software agency with a combined Czech and Slovak team of roughly 75 people, specializing in digital transformation, AI software, and technical due diligence work. It's the only Czech-headquartered company on this list, giving a UK buyer a genuinely different EU jurisdiction option alongside the more commonly seen Polish and Ukrainian vendors. Its boutique scale means closer team access than a larger firm, at the cost of the delivery capacity a bigger vendor can offer.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Moravio
| Capability | Endava | Moravio |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Moravio
| Framework / platform | Endava | Moravio |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Moravio
| Criterion | Endava | Moravio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Moravio
| Dimension | Endava | Moravio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK buyer wanting technical due diligence on an acquisition target's codebase., A company wanting EU delivery outside the more commonly used Poland or Ukraine. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Moravio: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Moravio | |
|---|---|
| + | A distinct Czech Republic EU jurisdiction, different from the Polish and Ukrainian majority on this list. |
| + | Boutique scale gives closer team access than a larger firm. |
| + | Named technical due diligence service, useful for a buyer vetting an existing codebase. |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity for large, multi-team programs |
| - | Less brand recognition in the UK market than the more established Polish and Ukrainian firms on this list |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Moravio?
A typical fit: a UK buyer wanting technical due diligence on an acquisition target's codebase.
The only Czech Republic-headquartered company on this list, a distinct EU jurisdiction from the Polish and Ukrainian majority. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Moravio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Moravio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Moravio |
Use case fit: Endava vs Moravio
| Use case | Endava fit | Moravio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK buyer wanting technical due diligence on an acquisition target's codebase. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A company wanting EU delivery outside the more commonly used Poland or Ukraine. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Moravio
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Moravio (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need a company wanting EU delivery outside the more commonly used Poland or Ukraine. If your situation matches that, Moravio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Moravio FAQ
Is Endava better than Moravio?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Moravio's strongest advantage: a distinct Czech Republic EU jurisdiction, different from the Polish and Ukrainian majority on this list.
How do Endava and Moravio differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Moravio uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Moravio?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Moravio?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Moravio's primary differentiator is: the only Czech Republic-headquartered company on this list, a distinct EU jurisdiction from the Polish and Ukrainian majority. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs ~75 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs SaaS, Manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.