Endava vs Netguru: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Netguru (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Netguru is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting EU-native GDPR compliance without extra data-transfer complexity. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Netguru: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2008 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Poznań, Poland |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 500-999 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | EU headquarters that simplifies GDPR-aligned data processing for UK clients post-Brexit |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, React Native, Node.js |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Fintech, Healthcare, SaaS |
Endava vs Netguru: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Netguru
Netguru was founded in Poznań, Poland in 2008 and has grown to somewhere between 500 and 999 employees, building software, mobile apps, and product design for international clients. Being headquartered inside the EU means Netguru operates under the same GDPR framework a UK company would recognize from its own compliance obligations, even post-Brexit, simplifying data-processing agreements in a way a non-EU vendor cannot. That EU-native compliance posture is a genuine differentiator for a UK buyer specifically weighing data-protection fit.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Netguru
| Capability | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✗ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Netguru
| Framework / platform | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Netguru
| Criterion | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Netguru
| Dimension | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Fintech, Healthcare, SaaS |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK fintech or healthtech company wanting EU-native GDPR compliance built in., A product company needing combined design and engineering from one team. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Netguru: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Netguru | |
|---|---|
| + | EU headquarters simplifies GDPR-aligned data processing for UK clients. |
| + | Combined software, mobile, and product design capability under one team. |
| + | Mid-large team size, giving real capacity for product-scale engagements. |
| - | No dedicated physical UK office, unlike Ciklum or Endava |
| - | General product-development positioning without one sharply named technical specialty |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Netguru?
A typical fit: a UK fintech or healthtech company wanting EU-native GDPR compliance built in.
EU headquarters that simplifies GDPR-aligned data processing for UK clients post-Brexit. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, SaaS.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Netguru
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Netguru (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Netguru
| Use case | Endava fit | Netguru fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK fintech or healthtech company wanting EU-native GDPR compliance built in. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product company needing combined design and engineering from one team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Netguru
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Netguru (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a product company needing combined design and engineering from one team. If your situation matches that, Netguru is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Netguru FAQ
Is Endava better than Netguru?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Netguru's strongest advantage: EU headquarters simplifies GDPR-aligned data processing for UK clients.
How do Endava and Netguru differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Netguru uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Netguru?
Netguru is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Netguru?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Netguru's primary differentiator is: EU headquarters that simplifies GDPR-aligned data processing for UK clients post-Brexit. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 500-999), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.