Endava vs Softengi: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Softengi (3.6/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Softengi is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting a long-established Kyiv vendor for general development. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Softengi: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Softengi |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1995 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | Among the longest-running Kyiv software companies still delivering within UK working-hours overlap |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, .NET, React |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Enterprise software, Retail |
Endava vs Softengi: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Softengi
Three decades of general custom development and consulting sit behind Softengi's current positioning, dating back to a 1995 founding in Kyiv, part of the earlier wave of Ukrainian software companies to launch after independence, with a timezone that overlaps UK working hours comfortably. Public data on its current team size and specialization is thinner than for the more heavily marketed firms on this list, so buyers should verify current capacity directly. Its positioning is general enterprise software development rather than a named vertical or technical niche.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Softengi
| Capability | Endava | Softengi |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Softengi
| Framework / platform | Endava | Softengi |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Softengi
| Criterion | Endava | Softengi |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Softengi
| Dimension | Endava | Softengi |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Enterprise software, Retail |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK buyer wanting a longer-established Kyiv vendor for general custom development., A project that doesn't require a named vertical specialization. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Softengi: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Softengi | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded in 1995, among the longer-operating Ukrainian software companies on this list. |
| + | Kyiv timezone allows genuine UK working-day overlap. |
| + | Kyiv-based, general custom software and consulting practice. |
| - | Thinner public documentation of current team size and specialization than more heavily marketed peers; verify directly (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| - | No clearly named industry or technical specialization |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Softengi?
A typical fit: a UK buyer wanting a longer-established Kyiv vendor for general custom development.
Among the longest-running Kyiv software companies still delivering within UK working-hours overlap. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Enterprise software, Retail.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Softengi
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Softengi (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Softengi |
Use case fit: Endava vs Softengi
| Use case | Endava fit | Softengi fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK buyer wanting a longer-established Kyiv vendor for general custom development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A project that doesn't require a named vertical specialization. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Softengi
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Softengi (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need a project that doesn't require a named vertical specialization. If your situation matches that, Softengi is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Softengi FAQ
Is Endava better than Softengi?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Softengi's strongest advantage: founded in 1995, among the longer-operating Ukrainian software companies on this list.
How do Endava and Softengi differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Softengi uses fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Softengi?
Softengi is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Softengi?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Softengi's primary differentiator is: among the longest-running Kyiv software companies still delivering within UK working-hours overlap. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Enterprise software, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.