Endava vs Yalantis: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Yalantis (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Yalantis is the stronger option for UK healthtech and IoT product companies wanting EU-based compliance-literate specialists. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Yalantis: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2008 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Warsaw, Poland (Dnipro-founded) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 201–500 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | An EU-headquartered, GDPR-native healthcare and IoT specialization |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React Native, Node.js, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech |
Endava vs Yalantis: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Yalantis
Warsaw is Yalantis's corporate headquarters today, which puts it inside the EU's GDPR framework directly and simplifies data-processing terms for a UK buyer compared with a vendor headquartered further away. The company itself started in Dnipro in 2008 and now runs a 201-500 person team focused specifically on compliant healthcare and IoT product engineering. That specialization is genuine, verifiable in its public case studies, but it's irrelevant to a UK buyer needing broad general-purpose development instead.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Yalantis
| Capability | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✗ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Yalantis
| Framework / platform | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Yalantis
| Criterion | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Yalantis
| Dimension | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware compliant software development., An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Yalantis: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Yalantis | |
|---|---|
| + | EU headquarters in Warsaw gives direct GDPR framework alignment for UK data-processing terms. |
| + | Visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies. |
| + | Mid-size team large enough for real product programs, still founder-accessible. |
| - | Healthcare and IoT specialization adds less value for a buyer needing general-purpose development |
| - | No dedicated UK office; contact runs through the Warsaw base |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Yalantis?
A typical fit: a UK healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware compliant software development.
An EU-headquartered, GDPR-native healthcare and IoT specialization. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Yalantis
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Yalantis (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Yalantis
| Use case | Endava fit | Yalantis fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware compliant software development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Yalantis
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Yalantis (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need an IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. If your situation matches that, Yalantis is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Yalantis FAQ
Is Endava better than Yalantis?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Yalantis's strongest advantage: EU headquarters in Warsaw gives direct GDPR framework alignment for UK data-processing terms.
How do Endava and Yalantis differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Yalantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Yalantis?
Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Yalantis?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Yalantis's primary differentiator is: an EU-headquartered, GDPR-native healthcare and IoT specialization. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 201–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Healthcare, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.